linux-kernel - RE: [RFC PATCH] dma: coherent: respect to device 'dma-coherent' property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 09:55:38 +0000
From:   "Z.Q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@....com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] dma: coherent: respect to device 'dma-coherent'
 property

Hi Robin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 8:28 PM
> To: Z.Q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@....com>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> m.szyprowski@...sung.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dma: coherent: respect to device 'dma-coherent'
> property
> 
> On 2023-04-17 03:06, Z.Q. Hou wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2023 2:30 PM
> >> To: Z.Q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@....com>
> >> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; hch@....de;
> >> m.szyprowski@...sung.com; robin.murphy@....com
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dma: coherent: respect to device 'dma-coherent'
> >> property
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 04:03:07PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote:
> >>> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
> >>>
> >>> Currently, the coherent DMA memory is always mapped as writecombine
> >>> and uncached, ignored the 'dma-coherent' property in device node,
> >>> this patch is to map the memory as writeback and cached when the
> >>> device has 'dma-coherent' property.
> >>
> >> What is the use case here? The somewhat misnamed per-device coherent
> >> memory is intended for small per-device pools of sram or such used
> >> for staging memory.
> >
> > In my case, there are multiple Cortex-A cores within the cluster, in
> > which it is cache coherent, they are split into 2 island for running Linux and
> RTOS respectively.
> > I created a virtual device for Linux and RTOS communication using shared
> memory.
> > In Linux side, I created a per-device dma memory pool and added
> 'dma-coherent'
> > for the virtual device, but the data in shared memory can't be sync
> > up, finally found the per-device dma pool is always mapped as uncached, so
> submitted this fix patch.
> 
> Yes, in principle this should apply similarly to restricted DMA or confidential
> compute VMs where DMA buffers are to be allocated from a predetermined
> shared memory area, and a DT reserved-memory region is used as a coherent
> pool to achieve that. Quite likely that so far this has only been done with
> non-coherent hardware or in software models where a mismatch in nominal
> cacheability wasn't noticeable.
> 
> It's a bit niche, but not entirely unreasonable.
> 

Understand, this change doesn't affect the ones without 'dma-coherent', and it can improve the performance leveraging the hardware cache coherent feature.
And in the CMA, it maps the memory as cacheable when the device node has 'dma-coherent', otherwise non-cacheable.
So this change aligns the behavior of the per-device dma pool to the CMA.

Thanks,
Zhiqiang