linux-kernel - [Patch 2/6] cpufreq: CPPC: make workaround apply code generic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230418113459.12860-3-sumitg@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:04:55 +0530
From:   Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
To:     <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
        <ionela.voinescu@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <sudeep.holla@....com>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <treding@...dia.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <vsethi@...dia.com>,
        <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, <sanjayc@...dia.com>,
        <ksitaraman@...dia.com>, <bbasu@...dia.com>, <sumitg@...dia.com>
Subject: [Patch 2/6] cpufreq: CPPC: make workaround apply code generic

Expand the code which applies SoC workarounds to make it generic
and easy to reuse.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 022e3555407c..15c2cbb7a50e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -43,10 +43,13 @@ static LIST_HEAD(cpu_data_list);
 
 static bool boost_supported;
 
+static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void);
+
 struct cppc_workaround_oem_info {
 	char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1];
 	char oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE + 1];
 	u32 oem_revision;
+	void (*apply_wa_func)(void);
 };
 
 static struct cppc_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] = {
@@ -54,10 +57,12 @@ static struct cppc_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] = {
 		.oem_id		= "HISI  ",
 		.oem_table_id	= "HIP07   ",
 		.oem_revision	= 0,
+		.apply_wa_func	= cppc_check_hisi_workaround,
 	}, {
 		.oem_id		= "HISI  ",
 		.oem_table_id	= "HIP08   ",
 		.oem_revision	= 0,
+		.apply_wa_func	= cppc_check_hisi_workaround,
 	}
 };
 
@@ -938,6 +943,13 @@ static unsigned int hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
 }
 
 static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)
+{
+	/* Overwrite the get() callback */
+	cppc_cpufreq_driver.get = hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate;
+	fie_disabled = FIE_DISABLED;
+}
+
+static void cppc_apply_workarounds(void)
 {
 	struct acpi_table_header *tbl;
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
@@ -951,9 +963,8 @@ static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)
 		if (!memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_id, tbl->oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE) &&
 		    !memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_table_id, tbl->oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) &&
 		    wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision) {
-			/* Overwrite the get() callback */
-			cppc_cpufreq_driver.get = hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate;
-			fie_disabled = FIE_DISABLED;
+			/* call work around function which matched from the table */
+			wa_info[i].apply_wa_func();
 			break;
 		}
 	}
@@ -968,7 +979,7 @@ static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)
 	if (!acpi_cpc_valid())
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	cppc_check_hisi_workaround();
+	cppc_apply_workarounds();
 	cppc_freq_invariance_init();
 	populate_efficiency_class();
 
-- 
2.17.1