[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e59d5d-89cb-ba82-f0fc-ecddb9bdfc2a@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:53:23 +0300
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588 timer
On 4/18/23 14:29, Johan Jonker wrote:
>
>
> On 4/18/23 11:53, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> Add DT node for Rockchip RK3588/RK3588S SoC timer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>> index 657c019d27fa..acd89a55374a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>> @@ -1400,6 +1400,14 @@ i2c5: i2c@...d0000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>
>> + rktimer: timer@...e0000 {
>
> There are multiple timers.
> Use a label in line with the TRM.
> Maybe change your label to "timer0" in that trend?
Sure, will use "timer0".
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xfeae0000 0x0 0x20>;
>
>> + clocks = <&cru PCLK_BUSTIMER0>, <&cru CLK_BUSTIMER0>;
>> + clock-names = "pclk", "timer";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 289 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>
> Heiko's sort rules:
>
> compatible
> reg
> interrupts
> [alphabetical]
> status [if needed]
Thanks for pointing this out! The sort rule was not obvious as there are
many other nodes that don't conform.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists