linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Remove unnecessary blank lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ae487706-1081-bab3-0b31-1c5b3a72890e@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:19:33 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay@...s.st.com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Remove unnecessary blank
 lines

On 18/04/2023 15:03, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/18/23 09:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/04/2023 18:14, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>>> Remove double blank line.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@...s.st.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
>>>    V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include fil
>> More than one file has the same issue. This is quite a churn to handle
>> such patch one by one. Please fix all of them or just skip, as it is
>> harmless.
> 
> 
> To be crystal clear, it is minor difference between files in U-Boot
> 
> and in Linux, just because we correct the check-patch errors
> 
> when this file for STM32F4 was up streamed in U-Boot.
> 
> 
> I prefer correct this line in the Linux file and no having
> 
> this difference for each device tree synchronization with U-Boot.

I don't know what is there in U-Boot, so my comment was not about it. I
prefer all the files in Linux kernel being correct, but done once for
all. Not once for stm32XX, then later for stm32XY and then stm32XZ...

Best regards,
Krzysztof