[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZD6envPT9YHVEaAx@alley>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:43:58 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] printk: console: Create console= parser that
supports named options
On Mon 2023-04-17 16:08:11, Chris Down wrote:
> Chris Down writes:
> > Any thoughts on something simple like this that takes advantage of
> > memmove()? This should overcome the mmio/io concerns, and it's fairly
> > simple.
>
> (although coming to think of it, this can just use memcpy(), but the same
> idea applies)
I think that we have to use memmove() because the locations might be
overlaping. The to-be-moved options might be longer than the replaced
option.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists