[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb229562-b0af-88f4-1207-ac23a6076dff@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 18:54:18 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC: <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/dpu: Drop unused members from HW structs
On 4/17/2023 4:14 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> Some of these members were initialized while never read, while others
> were not even assigned any value at all. Drop them to save some space,
> and above all confusion when looking at these members.
>
> Fixes: 25fdd5933e4c ("drm/msm: Add SDM845 DPU support")
> Fixes: 84a33d0fd921 ("drm/msm/dpu: add dpu_hw_wb abstraction for writeback blocks")
> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> ---
It seems like WB UBWC formats are not supported today. Because otherwise
ctx->mdp would be used for writeback. I guess we can add a ubwc member
similar to hw_sspp, when we do add the support for this. Hence this is,
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists