linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/91] 5.15.108-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 20:17:12 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/91] 5.15.108-rc1 review

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 18:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.108 release.
> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:02:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.108-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Following patch causing build break on stable-rc 5.15


> Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>     cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset_can_fork() and cpuset_cancel_fork() methods

cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset_can_fork() and cpuset_cancel_fork() methods
commit eee87853794187f6adbe19533ed79c8b44b36a91 upstream.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Build error:
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_can_fork':
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2979:30: error: 'cgroup_mutex' undeclared
(first use in this function); did you mean 'cgroup_put'?
 2979 |         lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:415:61: note: in definition of macro
'lockdep_assert_held'
  415 | #define lockdep_assert_held(l)                  do {
(void)(l); } while (0)
      |                                                             ^
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2979:30: note: each undeclared identifier is
reported only once for each function it appears in
 2979 |         lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:415:61: note: in definition of macro
'lockdep_assert_held'
  415 | #define lockdep_assert_held(l)                  do {
(void)(l); } while (0)
      |                                                             ^
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.o] Error 1


build log:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.105-280-g0b6a5617247c/testrun/16291026/suite/build/test/gcc-11-lkftconfig-kunit/log

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org