linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: do not increment pgfault stats when page fault handler retries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:19:40 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...e.com, josef@...icpanda.com, jack@...e.cz,
        ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@...ibm.com,
        michel@...pinasse.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, jglisse@...gle.com,
        vbabka@...e.cz, minchan@...gle.com, dave@...olabs.net,
        punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: do not increment pgfault stats when page
 fault handler retries

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:47:57PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:26 PM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 05:08:18PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > @@ -5223,8 +5230,8 @@ vm_fault_t handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > >               if (task_in_memcg_oom(current) && !(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
> > >                       mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(false);
> > >       }
> > > -
> > > -     mm_account_fault(regs, address, flags, ret);
> > > +out:
> > > +     mm_account_fault(mm, regs, address, flags, ret);
> >
> > Ah, one more question.. can this cached mm race with a destroying mm (just
> > like the vma race we wanted to avoid)?  Still a question only applies to
> > COMPLETE case when mmap read lock can be released.  Thanks,
> 
> I believe that is impossible because whoever is calling the page fault
> handler has stabilized the mm by getting a refcount.

Do you have a hint on where that refcount is taken?

Btw, it's definitely not a question sololy for this patch but a more common
question to the page fault path.  It's just that when I wanted to look for
any refcount boost (which I also expect to have somewhere) I didn't really
see that in current path (e.g. do_user_addr_fault() for x86_64).

I also had a quick look on do_exit() but I also didn't see where do we
e.g. wait for all the threads to stop before recycles a mm.

I had a feeling that I must have missed something, but just want to make
sure it's the case.

-- 
Peter Xu