linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/124] 5.10.178-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 21:15:09 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/124] 5.10.178-rc1 review

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 21:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:38:47PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 18:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.178 release.
> > > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:02:44 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.178-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Following build errors noticed on 5.15 and 5.10.,
> >
> >
> > > Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> > >     cgroup/cpuset: Change references of cpuset_mutex to cpuset_rwsem
> >
>
> That's a documentation patch, it can not:

Sorry for my mistake in trimming the email at the wrong place.

I have pasted down of the email as this suspected patch,

cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset_can_fork() and cpuset_cancel_fork() methods
commit eee87853794187f6adbe19533ed79c8b44b36a91 upstream.


> > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_can_fork':
> > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2941:30: error: 'cgroup_mutex' undeclared
> > (first use in this function); did you mean 'cgroup_put'?
> >  2941 |         lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
>
> Cause this.
>
> What arch is failing here?  This builds for x86.

Not for me.

List of regression builds.

Regressions found on x86_64:
 - build/gcc-12-defconfig

Regressions found on i386:
 - build/gcc-12-defconfig
 - build/gcc-11-lkftconfig

Regressions found on arm64:
 - build/gcc-11-lkftconfig

Regressions found on arm:
 - build/gcc-12-vexpress_defconfig
 - build/gcc-8-vexpress_defconfig

Regressions found on mips:
 - build/gcc-8-defconfig
 - build/gcc-12-defconfig


For 5.10 defconfigs failed,
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.176-298-g19b9d9b9f62e/testrun/16291316/suite/build/test/gcc-12-defconfig/history/


For 5.15 defconfigs failed,
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.105-280-g0b6a5617247c/testrun/16291199/suite/build/test/gcc-12-defconfig/history/


- Naresh