Message-ID: <07f2417e-9d47-3e73-cae5-3e7c95856f72@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:40:03 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Gé Koerkamp <ge.koerkamp@...il.com>,
        Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 216946 - Toshiba satellite click mini l9w-b:
 touchscreen: no touch events with kernel 6.1.4

Hi Gé,

On 4/19/23 18:21, Gé Koerkamp wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
> 
> travelling at the moment, but I’ll try. Not really into bisecting kernel issues, but let’s see where this goes. Another issue is, that I don’t have a Toshiba Mini Click myself, so I need to build the test Volumio images (volumio.org) with the different 5.16-rc kernel patch versions for a colleague to work with, hopefully  he has time to do this.

I have just dug my own Toshiba Mini Click up from the bottom of the storage box it was in.

It is currently charging since the battery was fully flat.

So I suggest you give me a couple of days to take a look before you go to all this trouble.

Regards,

Hans




> 
> Thanks - Gé
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 17 Apr 2023, at 13:55, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>> On 01.03.23 12:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> On 2/28/23 14:26, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:32 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
>>>> <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19.01.23 16:06, Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
>>>>>> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
>>>>>> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216946 :
>>>>>
>>>>> The reporter recently confirmed in the ticket that the issue still
>>>>> happens with 6.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> There wasn't any reply from any of the input developers here or in
>>>>> bugzilla afaics. :-/ Hmmm. Could someone from that camp maybe please
>>>>> take a minute and at least briefly look into this as answer something
>>>>> like "that might be due to a problem in subsystem 'foo'", "maybe ask bar
>>>>> for an option", or "we have no idea what might cause this, this needs to
>>>>> be bisected"? That would help a lot.
>>>>
>>>> The working dmesg shows a line with:
>>>> hid-generic 0018:0457:10FB.0002: input,hidraw1: I2C HID v1.00 Device
>>>> [SIS0817:00 0457:10FB] on i2c-SIS0817:00
>>>> and then
>>>> hid-multitouch 0018:0457:10FB.0002: input,hidraw1: I2C HID v1.00
>>>> Device [SIS0817:00 0457:10FB] on i2c-SIS0817:00
>>>>
>>>> But these 2 lines do not appear on the 6.1.4 logs.
>>>>
>>>> So the device is not properly enumerated by ACPI or I2C. Hans might
>>>> have an idea on how to debug/solve that issue.
>>>
>>> I actually have a Toshiba satellite click mini l9w-b lying around
>>> myself. I already made a note to try and reproduce this
>>>
>>> But I'm very much swamped with too much kernel work, so no promises
>>> when I will get around to this ...
>>
>> Has anyone made any progress with this? Doesn't look like it, hence I
>> wondered if this fall through the cracks; but maybe I'm just missing
>> something.
>>
>> Gé Koerkamp: with a bit of luck Hans sooner or later will have time to
>> look into this, but it might speed things up if you could try to bisect
>> this.
>>
>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>> --
>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>
>> #regzbot poke
>>
>>>>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>>>>> --
>>>>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>>>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>>>>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>>>>
>>>>> #regzbot poke
>>>>>>> Gé Koerkamp 2023-01-17 20:21:51 UTC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Created attachment 303619 [details]
>>>>>>> Kernel configuration for v6.1.4/ journalctl (dmesg)/ ACPIdump/lsmod
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Overview:
>>>>>>> The touchscreen does not react on touch events.
>>>>>>> Touchscreen display and touchpad are working.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Step to reproduce:
>>>>>>> Open any UI page
>>>>>>> Try to use touch on relevant UI controls (buttons etc.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Result:
>>>>>>> No reaction on screen touches
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Expected result:
>>>>>>> Reaction on touched control, same as when using the touch pad or connected mouse (which do work).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Build information:
>>>>>>> The error happens with kernel version 6.1.4
>>>>>>> After rebuilding with different kernel versions, it appears that it first fails with kernel 5.16
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Additional builds:
>>>>>>> The click mini l9w-b still works with kernel 5.10.y LTS and 5.15.y LTS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Important remark:
>>>>>>> Touchscreen still works fine with kernel 6.1.4 using
>>>>>>> - an HP x2 detachable 10-p0xx or
>>>>>>> - a Lenovo yoga 520-14ikb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So it could be a hardware dependent issue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See the ticket for more details.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [TLDR for the rest of this mail: I'm adding this report to the list of
>>>>>> tracked Linux kernel regressions; the text you find below is based on a
>>>>>> few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar
>>>>>> form.]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, let me use this mail to also add the report to the list of tracked
>>>>>> regressions to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #regzbot introduced: v5.15..v5.16
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216946
>>>>>> #regzbot title: hid: touchscreen broken with Toshiba satellite click
>>>>>> mini l9w-b
>>>>>> #regzbot ignore-activity
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
>>>>>> discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
>>>>>> the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
>>>>>> something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
>>>>>> while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
>>>>>> the footer of this mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
>>>>>> to the report (e.g. the buzgzilla ticket and maybe this mail as well, if
>>>>>> this thread sees some discussion). See page linked in footer for details.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>>>>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>>>>>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists