[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230419184547.GA4013083-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:45:47 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] edac: cpc925: Use of_get_cpu_hwid() to read CPU node
'reg'
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 07:50:00PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:01:41AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Replace open coded reading of CPU nodes' "reg" properties with
> > of_get_cpu_hwid() dedicated for this purpose.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> > index ee193aae8e14..0182436c1b5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> > @@ -557,13 +557,13 @@ static u32 cpc925_cpu_mask_disabled(void)
> > mask = APIMASK_ADI0 | APIMASK_ADI1;
> >
> > for_each_of_cpu_node(cpunode) {
> > - const u32 *reg = of_get_property(cpunode, "reg", NULL);
> > - if (reg == NULL || *reg > 2) {
> > + int hwid = of_get_cpu_hwid(cpunode, 0);
> > + if ((hwid < 0) || (hwid > 2)) {
> > cpc925_printk(KERN_ERR, "Bad reg value at %pOF\n", cpunode);
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > - mask &= ~APIMASK_ADI(*reg);
> > + mask &= ~APIMASK_ADI(hwid);
> > }
> >
> > if (mask != (APIMASK_ADI0 | APIMASK_ADI1)) {
> > --
>
> $ grep CPC925 .config
> CONFIG_EDAC_CPC925=m
>
> $ make ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=/home/boris/src/crosstool/gcc-11.1.0-nolibc/powerpc64-linux/bin/powerpc64-linux-
> ...
> ERROR: modpost: ".of_get_cpu_hwid" [drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.ko] undefined!
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:136: Module.symvers] Error 1
> make: *** [Makefile:1980: modpost] Error 2
I'd rather not export of_get_cpu_hwid() which is otherwise only used in
arch code. I think I'll rewrite this in terms of for_each_possible_cpu()
and topology_core_id(). Though that would make a UP build not enable
core 1, but that seems undesirable anyways.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists