[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230419091326.1327018d@booty>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 09:13:26 +0200
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Tretter <m.tretter@...gutronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Mike Pagano <mpagano@...too.org>,
Krzysztof HaĆasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Satish Nagireddy <satish.nagireddy@...cruise.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/8] i2c: add I2C Address Translator (ATR) support
Hi Wolfram, Tomi,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:25:02 +0200
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Tomi, hi Luca,
>
> as mentioned on IRC already, good move to use bus notifiers here and
> drop the generic attach/detach callbacks. Those were a show stopper for
> me. This version is nicely self contained. I like that!
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/index.rst b/Documentation/i2c/index.rst
> > index 6270f1fd7d4e..aaf33d1315f4 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/i2c/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/i2c/index.rst
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Introduction
> > instantiating-devices
> > busses/index
> > i2c-topology
> > + muxes/i2c-atr
>
> The muxes-dir is only for the description of mux drivers. I'd prefer to
> have this document not in the sub-dir. Also, renaming the document to
> "address-translations.rst" might be worth discussing.
>
> > muxes/i2c-mux-gpio
> > i2c-sysfs
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/muxes/i2c-atr.rst b/Documentation/i2c/muxes/i2c-atr.rst
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..da226fd4de63
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/i2c/muxes/i2c-atr.rst
> > @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +=====================
> > +Kernel driver i2c-atr
>
> Maybe "I2C address translations"?
Even better: "I2C address translator dirvers", or just "I2C address
translators"? Here we document a facility to implement a driver for
an address translator, and discussion on "address translation" in
general is just a part of it. Same for the filename.
Uh, I guess this was a journey in the realm of nitpicking, sorry... :)
> > +Description
> > +-----------
> > +
> > +An I2C Address Translator (ATR) is a device with an I2C slave parent
> > +("upstream") port and N I2C master child ("downstream") ports, and
> > +forwards transactions from upstream to the appropriate downstream port
> > +with a modified slave address. The address used on the parent bus is
> > +called the "alias" and is (potentially) different from the physical
> > +slave address of the child bus. Address translation is done by the
> > +hardware.
> > +
> > +An ATR looks similar to an i2c-mux except:
> > + - the address on the parent and child busses can be different
> > + - there is normally no need to select the child port; the alias used on the
> > + parent bus implies it
> > +
> > +The ATR functionality can be provided by a chip with many other
> > +features. This file provides a helper to implement an ATR within your
>
> I'd like to get rid of all "your". Maybe "client driver" here?
I agree.
> > +
> > +I2C ATR functions and data structures
> > +-------------------------------------
> > +
>
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair - Holds the alias assigned to a client.
>
> I stumbled over this one because "cli" is "command line interface" for
> me... The long version isn't much longer: 'i2c_atr_client_alias_pair'
> But I'd be also fine with: 'i2c_atr_alias_pair'
The short one looks better to me. The only "alias" involved in ATRs is
the client alias, thus no ambiguity.
Best regards,
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists