linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/91] 5.15.108-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023041959-ammonia-subheader-0bce@gregkh>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 09:24:26 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/91] 5.15.108-rc1 review

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:17:12PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 18:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.108 release.
> > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:02:44 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.108-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Following patch causing build break on stable-rc 5.15
> 
> 
> > Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> >     cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset_can_fork() and cpuset_cancel_fork() methods
> 
> cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset_can_fork() and cpuset_cancel_fork() methods
> commit eee87853794187f6adbe19533ed79c8b44b36a91 upstream.
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> Build error:
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_can_fork':
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2979:30: error: 'cgroup_mutex' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'cgroup_put'?
>  2979 |         lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
>       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/lockdep.h:415:61: note: in definition of macro
> 'lockdep_assert_held'
>   415 | #define lockdep_assert_held(l)                  do {
> (void)(l); } while (0)
>       |                                                             ^
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2979:30: note: each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once for each function it appears in
>  2979 |         lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
>       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/lockdep.h:415:61: note: in definition of macro
> 'lockdep_assert_held'
>   415 | #define lockdep_assert_held(l)                  do {
> (void)(l); } while (0)
>       |                                                             ^
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.o] Error 1
> 
> 
> build log:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.105-280-g0b6a5617247c/testrun/16291026/suite/build/test/gcc-11-lkftconfig-kunit/log
> 
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org

I've now dropped the offending patches and pushed out -rc2 releases for
this, and the 5.10.y tree.

thanks,

greg k-h