linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/88] 5.15.108-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f10dd20e-6dce-490a-f3fb-fdf79e83bc1d@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:11:32 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/88] 5.15.108-rc2 review

On 4/19/23 00:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.108 release.
> There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 21 Apr 2023 07:21:37 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.108-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> 
...
> Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
>      riscv: Do not set initial_boot_params to the linear address of the dtb
> 

As expected, a quick test shows that this patch still results in immediate
riscv32/64 crashes.

[    0.000000] random: crng init done
[    0.000000] OF: fdt: Ignoring memory range 0x80000000 - 0x80200000
[    0.000000] Machine model: riscv-virtio,qemu
[    0.000000] earlycon: uart8250 at MMIO 0x0000000010000000 (options '115200')
[    0.000000] printk: bootconsole [uart8250] enabled
[    0.000000] efi: UEFI not found.
[    0.000000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000040000001
[    0.000000] Oops [#1]
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.15.108-rc2-00089-g6405847d6038 #1
[    0.000000] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    0.000000] epc : fdt_check_header+0x6/0x1fc
[    0.000000]  ra : __unflatten_device_tree+0x32/0x10a
[    0.000000] epc : ffffffff804a76e2 ra : ffffffff80723c22 sp : ffffffff81403eb0
[    0.000000]  gp : ffffffff815c6408 tp : ffffffff81411280 t0 : ffffffcefefff000
[    0.000000]  t1 : 000000009ffff000 t2 : 0000000000000004 s0 : ffffffff81403ec0
[    0.000000]  s1 : 0000000040000088 a0 : 0000000040000000 a1 : 0000000000000000
[    0.000000]  a2 : ffffffff815cadd0 a3 : ffffffff80a26fbe a4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.000000]  a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000001000 a7 : 0000000000000048
[    0.000000]  s2 : 0000000040000000 s3 : ffffffff815cadd0 s4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.000000]  s5 : ffffffff80a26fbe s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 000000000000007f
[    0.000000]  s8 : 0000000080019038 s9 : 000000008003d6a8 s10: 0000000000000000
[    0.000000]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : ffffffff80c191e8 t4 : ffffffff80c191e8
[    0.000000]  t5 : ffffffff80c191e8 t6 : ffffffff80c19200
[    0.000000] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000040000001 cause: 000000000000000d
[    0.000000] [<ffffffff804a76e2>] fdt_check_header+0x6/0x1fc
[    0.000000] ---[ end trace 2baf78845f288dac ]---

Guenter