[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bkjki8p8.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 10:21:07 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Pierre Asselin <pa@...ix.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Pierre Asselin <pa@...ix.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware/sysfb: Fix VESA format selection
Pierre Asselin <pa@...ix.com> writes:
Hello Pierre,
> Some legacy BIOSes report no reserved bits in their 32-bit rgb mode,
> breaking the calculation of bits_per_pixel in commit f35cd3fa7729
> [firmware/sysfb: Fix EFI/VESA format selection]. However they report
> lfb_depth correctly for those modes. Keep the computation but
> set bits_per_pixel to lfb_depth if the latter is larger.
>
> v2 fixes the warnings from a max3() macro with arguments of different
> types; split the bits_per_pixel assignment to avoid uglyfing the code
> with too many typecasts.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4Psm6B6Lqkz1QXM@panix3.panix.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230412150225.3757223-1-javierm@redhat.com
> Fixes: f35cd3fa7729 [firmware/sysfb: Fix EFI/VESA format selection]
The convention is f35cd3fa7729 ("firmware/sysfb: Fix EFI/VESA format selection")
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Asselin <pa@...ix.com>
> ---
[...]
> + bits_per_pixel= max(bits_per_pixel, (u32)si->lfb_depth);
You are missing a space here.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists