linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH v7 00/16] net: Add basic LED support for switch/phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ceb81b05-caf7-4738-b288-02aa662ccd49@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:20:02 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 00/16] net: Add basic LED support for
 switch/phy

> IIRC we were supposed to take these via netdev with acks from Pavel/Lee.
> So we need acks on patches 4/5/16 ? If there is a repost, could you
> take out the arch/arm patches? They should not go via netdev, we'll try
> to filter them out when applying but mistakes happen.

The 370rd patch could in theory go via netdev. I maintain it, both at
the board and mvebu SoC level, so can give my Acked-by:, in addition
to my Signed-off-by:. It is very unlikely there will be any sort of
merge conflict.

      Andrew