linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: defconfig: enable TI K3 R5 and DSP remote proc drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:46:45 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        quic_bjorande@...cinc.com, arnd@...db.de, treding@...dia.com,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, nfraprado@...labora.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, rafal@...ecki.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: defconfig: enable TI K3 R5 and DSP remote proc
 drivers

On 19/04/2023 13:52, Hari Nagalla wrote:
> On 4/19/23 06:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Why two separate patches for simple defconfig change?
> The intention is to separate commits for enabling mailbox driver from 
> remote proc drivers. The mailbox driver is used by the TI K3 system 
> controller interface (SCI) driver as well, which is independent of 
> remote proc drivers.

Yeah, but why? This is simple defconfig change, just enabling drivers
for same platform. With such arguments are we going to enable all
drivers everywhere one-by-one?

Best regards,
Krzysztof