[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZD/jaASktd2cBlnI@shredder>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:49:44 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Hans J. Schultz" <netdev@...io-technology.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries
with "master dynamic"
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 06:59:02PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index de18e9c1d7a7..ba95c4d74a60 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,17 @@ br_switchdev_fdb_notify(struct net_bridge *br,
> if (test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags))
> return;
Thanks for the patch. Ran a few tests and looks fine. Will report full
results tomorrow morning.
>
> + /* Entries with these flags were created using ndm_state == NUD_REACHABLE,
> + * ndm_flags == NTF_MASTER( | NTF_STICKY), ext_flags == 0 by something
> + * equivalent to 'bridge fdb add ... master dynamic (sticky)'.
> + * Drivers don't know how to deal with these, so don't notify them to
> + * avoid confusing them.
> + */
> + if (test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags) &&
> + !test_bit(BR_FDB_STATIC, &fdb->flags) &&
> + !test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_EXT_LEARN, &fdb->flags))
> + return;
> +
> br_switchdev_fdb_populate(br, &item, fdb, NULL);
>
> switch (type) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists