linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/132] 6.1.25-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:21:05 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
Cc:     Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, stable@...r.kernel.org, hi@...ssa.is,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/132] 6.1.25-rc2 review

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 05:46:50AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 4/19/23 4:58 AM, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> > On 19/04/2023 10:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.25 release.
> > > There are 132 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:36:33 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >           https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.25-rc2.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >           git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > > 
> > > Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>
> > >       purgatory: fix disabling debug info
> > Alyssa provided a custom backport of this that did not require
> > picking up Heiko's patch below, but it did not seem to get
> > picked up.
> > Lore is ~dead for me, so all I can give you here is her message-id
> > for the custom backport: <20230418155237.2ubcusqc52nufmow@...0>
> > 
> > Heiko's patch is dead code as you've (rightly) not backported
> > any of the users.
> > > Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>
> > >       RISC-V: add infrastructure to allow different str* implementations
> > 
> > 
> > > Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
> > >       riscv: Do not set initial_boot_params to the linear address of the dtb
> > This one should also be dropped, either the whole series or
> > none of it please!
> > 
> > Alex has said he'll send the lot in a way that avoids confusion.
> > 
> > Otherwise, my testing passed.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
> The "riscv: Do not set initial_boot_params to the linear address of the dtb"
> patch is fatal. Definitely needs to be dropped.

Now dropped, thanks,

greg k-h