linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Return error on write frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64e98df-1663-1630-e2bf-5472aced5cac@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:35:11 +0300 (EEST)
From:   Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     hdegoede@...hat.com, markgross@...nel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Return error on write
 frequency

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

> Currently when the uncore_write() returns error, it is silently
> ignored. Return error to user space when uncore_write() fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@...el.com>
> ---
> This patch has no dependency on TPMI patches for uncore support.
> 
>  .../x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c    | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
> index cb24de9e97dc..fa8f14c925ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
> @@ -44,14 +44,18 @@ static ssize_t store_min_max_freq_khz(struct uncore_data *data,
>  				      int min_max)
>  {
>  	unsigned int input;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &input))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&uncore_lock);
> -	uncore_write(data, input, min_max);
> +	ret = uncore_write(data, input, min_max);
>  	mutex_unlock(&uncore_lock);
>  
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return count;
>  }

Shouldn't this have Fixes tag?

Other than that,

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>


-- 
 i.