[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEiF5kZvaQz5FPHONRM9WWugP4CT6yZZVDiw5=s-OZBEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:29:42 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: delete dead code in this_cpu_set_vectors()
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 09:58, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> The "slot" variable is an enum, and in this context it is an unsigned
> int. So the type means it can never be negative and also we never pass
> invalid data to this function. If something did pass invalid data then
> this check would be insufficient protection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
> index fca9cc6f5581..05f40c4e18fd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
> @@ -966,9 +966,6 @@ static void this_cpu_set_vectors(enum arm64_bp_harden_el1_vectors slot)
> {
> const char *v = arm64_get_bp_hardening_vector(slot);
>
> - if (slot < 0)
> - return;
> -
> __this_cpu_write(this_cpu_vector, v);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists