linux-kernel - [PATCH 10/11] drm/msm/dpu: tweak lm pairings in msm8998 hw catalog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:41:17 +0200
From:   Arnaud Vrac <avrac@...ebox.fr>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaud Vrac <avrac@...ebox.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] drm/msm/dpu: tweak lm pairings in msm8998 hw catalog

Change lm blocks pairs so that lm blocks with the same features are
paired together:

LM_0 and LM_1 with PP and DSPP
LM_2 and LM_5 with PP
LM_3 and LM_4

This matches the sdm845 configuration and allows using pp or dspp when 2
lm blocks are needed in the topology. In the previous config the
reservation code could never find an lm pair without a matching feature
set.

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Vrac <avrac@...ebox.fr>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
index 5ae1d41e3fa92..90db622eff4fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
@@ -102,17 +102,17 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg msm8998_sspp[] = {
 
 static const struct dpu_lm_cfg msm8998_lm[] = {
 	LM_BLK("lm_0", LM_0, 0x44000, MIXER_MSM8998_MASK,
-		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_0, LM_2, DSPP_0),
+		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_0, LM_1, DSPP_0),
 	LM_BLK("lm_1", LM_1, 0x45000, MIXER_MSM8998_MASK,
-		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_1, LM_5, DSPP_1),
+		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_1, LM_0, DSPP_1),
 	LM_BLK("lm_2", LM_2, 0x46000, MIXER_MSM8998_MASK,
-		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_2, LM_0, 0),
+		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_2, LM_5, 0),
 	LM_BLK("lm_3", LM_3, 0x47000, MIXER_MSM8998_MASK,
 		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_MAX, 0, 0),
 	LM_BLK("lm_4", LM_4, 0x48000, MIXER_MSM8998_MASK,
 		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_MAX, 0, 0),
 	LM_BLK("lm_5", LM_5, 0x49000, MIXER_MSM8998_MASK,
-		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_3, LM_1, 0),
+		&msm8998_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_3, LM_2, 0),
 };
 
 static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg msm8998_pp[] = {

-- 
2.40.0