[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230418180202.GA602488@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:02:02 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ocfs2-devel <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: reduce ioctl stack usage
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> > Andrew picked ocfs2 patches into -mm tree before.
>
> Yup and that's fine obviously, but this belongs to fs/ and we're aiming
> to take fs/ stuff through the dedicated fs trees going forward.
The challenge here is that there isn't an active ocfs2 tree at the
moment (git/jlbec/ocfs2.git was last updated 11 years ago), and it's
not clear ocfs2 has an active maintainer, although as discussed at a
recent ext4 telechat, there still are some enterprise users of it
hanging on.
We're starting considering changes to fs/jbd2 so we can get off of
using the struct bh for jbd2 (still very early days; it's more in the
early concept brain-storming stage.) And since ocfs2 also uses
fs/jbd2, the fact that ocfs2 isn't under active maintenance is going
to be more of a challenge moving forward.
Something we should discuss in the hallway track of LSF/MM, perhaps...
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists