linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] documentation: Block Devices Snapshots Module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:17:58 +0200
From:   Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@...am.com>
To:     Donald Buczek <buczek@...gen.mpg.de>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        <hch@...radead.org>, <corbet@....net>, <snitzer@...nel.org>
CC:     <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <brauner@...nel.org>,
        <willy@...radead.org>, <kch@...dia.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        <ming.lei@...hat.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] documentation: Block Devices Snapshots Module



On 4/20/23 16:44, Donald Buczek wrote:
> Subject:
> Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] documentation: Block Devices Snapshots Module
> From:
> Donald Buczek <buczek@...gen.mpg.de>
> Date:
> 4/20/23, 16:44
> 
> To:
> Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@...am.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@...radead.org, corbet@....net, snitzer@...nel.org
> CC:
> viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, kch@...dia.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, vkoul@...nel.org, ming.lei@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> 
> 
> On 4/19/23 21:42, Donald Buczek wrote:
>> Dear Sergei,
>>
>> On 4/19/23 15:05, Sergei Shtepa wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Patches in attach and https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FSergeiShtepa%2Flinux%2Ftree%2Fblksnap-master&data=05%7C01%7Csergei.shtepa%40veeam.com%7Cccc78e2cdf7845c6c0cd08db41add281%7Cba07baab431b49edadd7cbc3542f5140%7C1%7C0%7C638175987085694967%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RdrWqUwvk7gjfSRYvrPfz2E0%2BIOY6IQxK4xvpzJqcnk%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Thanks. I can confirm that this fixes the reported problem and I no longer can trigger the UAF. 😄
>>
>> Tested-Bny: Donald Buczek <buczek@...gen.mpg.de>
>>
>> Maybe you can add me to the cc list for v4 as I'm not subscribed to the lists.
> 
> 
> Sorry, found another one. Reproducer:
> 
> =====
> #! /bin/bash
> set -xe
> modprobe blksnap
> test -e /scratch/local/test.dat || fallocate -l 1G /scratch/local/test.dat
> s=$(blksnap snapshot_create -d /dev/vdb)
> blksnap snapshot_appendstorage -i $s -f /scratch/local/test.dat
> blksnap snapshot_take -i $s
> s2=$(blksnap snapshot_create -d /dev/vdb)
> blksnap snapshot_destroy -i $s2
> blksnap snapshot_destroy -i $s
> =====
> 
> 
> [20382.402921] blksnap-snapshot: Snapshot ff1c54f1-3e8c-4c99-bb26-35e82dc1c9fa was created
> [20382.535933] blksnap-image: Create snapshot image device for original device [253:16]
> [20382.542405] blksnap-snapshot: Snapshot ff1c54f1-3e8c-4c99-bb26-35e82dc1c9fa was taken successfully
> [20382.572564] blksnap-snapshot: Snapshot 4b2d571d-9a24-419d-96c2-8d64a07c4966 was created
> [20382.600521] blksnap-snapshot: Destroy snapshot 4b2d571d-9a24-419d-96c2-8d64a07c4966
> [20382.602373] blksnap-snapshot: Release snapshot 4b2d571d-9a24-419d-96c2-8d64a07c4966
> [20382.722137] blksnap-snapshot: Destroy snapshot ff1c54f1-3e8c-4c99-bb26-35e82dc1c9fa
> [20382.724033] blksnap-snapshot: Release snapshot ff1c54f1-3e8c-4c99-bb26-35e82dc1c9fa
> [20382.725850] ==================================================================
> [20382.727641] BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in snapshot_free+0x73/0x170 [blksnap]
> [20382.729326] Write of size 8 at addr dead000000000108 by task blksnap/8297
> ...

Great! Thanks.

There is no protection against re-adding a block device to the snapshot.
I'll take care of it.

And small update. I have made a correction to the bio allocation algorithm
for saving and loading chunks. Please, see attach and commit.
Link: https://github.com/SergeiShtepa/linux/commit/2628dd193fd3d563d26d5ccc82d35b2e11bbda38
But cases of large chunks or very large disks have not yet been covered
by tests, yet. 

I also had concerns that the snapshot writing algorithm was not working
correctly. But the concerns were in vain. The new test is working.
Link: https://github.com/veeam/blksnap/blob/stable-v2.0/tests/6000-snapimage_write.sh

View attachment "fix_page_inx_increment.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2341 bytes)