[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEGW-IcFReR1juVM@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:48:08 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/irdma: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from
alloc_ordered_workqueue() call
Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound
workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOUND
isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in the
future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c
@@ -1901,8 +1901,8 @@ int irdma_ctrl_init_hw(struct irdma_pci_
break;
rf->init_state = CEQ0_CREATED;
/* Handles processing of CQP completions */
- rf->cqp_cmpl_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("cqp_cmpl_wq",
- WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_UNBOUND);
+ rf->cqp_cmpl_wq =
+ alloc_ordered_workqueue("cqp_cmpl_wq", WQ_HIGHPRI);
if (!rf->cqp_cmpl_wq) {
status = -ENOMEM;
break;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists