[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230420204801.GO3390869@ZenIV>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:48:01 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ocfs2-devel <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: reduce ioctl stack usage
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> > Andrew picked ocfs2 patches into -mm tree before.
>
> Yup and that's fine obviously, but this belongs to fs/ and we're aiming
> to take fs/ stuff through the dedicated fs trees going forward.
Er... Assuming that there *is* an active fs tree for filesystem
in question. Do you really want dedicated e.g. affs, adfs, etc.
git trees - one for each filesystem in there?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists