[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcc96406-3f74-b79b-3f75-0c3bd88c5eea@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 23:40:03 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] thermal/drivers/intel_menlow: Make additionnal
sysfs information optional
On 20/04/2023 19:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[ ... ]
> After looking at it once more, I think that this driver isn't really
> functional without the additional sysfs attributes, so if
> CONFIG_INTEL_MENLOW_SYSFS_ADDON is set, the driver effectively becomes
> dead code.
>
> That's rather unfortunate and I'm not sure how to deal with it ATM.
>
> I can queue up the rest of the series for 6.4-rc1 (in which case it
> will be pushed in the second half of the merge window), but this
> particular patch requires more thought IMV.
I'm fine if you drop this one from the series.
Thanks for looking at it more deeply
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists