[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61bdd089-89b7-749b-95bd-c7e61c396e29@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 01:20:24 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/dpu: Drop unused members from HW
structs
On 21/04/2023 00:39, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-04-20 08:46:46, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/20/2023 7:33 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 18/04/2023 02:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>>> Some of these members were initialized while never read, while others
>>>> were not even assigned any value at all. Drop them to save some space,
>>>> and above all confusion when looking at these members.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 25fdd5933e4c ("drm/msm: Add SDM845 DPU support")
>>>> Fixes: 84a33d0fd921 ("drm/msm/dpu: add dpu_hw_wb abstraction for
>>>> writeback blocks")
>>>
>>> The fixes headers are slightly questionable, as unused fields are not a
>>> bug. Nevertheless:
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I would also not treat this as a "fix" but just cleanup.
>
> Ack to both. This seems like a fine line to me as the fields are not
> contributing to anything except confusion. Specifically hw_mdp which is
> never initialized and may accidentally be used without realizing that
> it'll stay NULL, but that is again up to the developer using the field
> at that point.
>
> Feel free to drop them while applying, or should I reword the message to
> at least still link these commits to mention the origin of the unused
> fields?
I'm fine with having the Fixes removed. If you can send the v2 reordered
& with tags removed, that would be the best.
>
> - Marijn
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists