linux-kernel - Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/dpu: Drop unused members from HW structs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 01:20:24 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm/dpu: Drop unused members from HW
 structs

On 21/04/2023 00:39, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-04-20 08:46:46, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/20/2023 7:33 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 18/04/2023 02:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>>> Some of these members were initialized while never read, while others
>>>> were not even assigned any value at all.  Drop them to save some space,
>>>> and above all confusion when looking at these members.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 25fdd5933e4c ("drm/msm: Add SDM845 DPU support")
>>>> Fixes: 84a33d0fd921 ("drm/msm/dpu: add dpu_hw_wb abstraction for
>>>> writeback blocks")
>>>
>>> The fixes headers are slightly questionable, as unused fields are not a
>>> bug. Nevertheless:
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I would also not treat this as a "fix" but just cleanup.
> 
> Ack to both.  This seems like a fine line to me as the fields are not
> contributing to anything except confusion.  Specifically hw_mdp which is
> never initialized and may accidentally be used without realizing that
> it'll stay NULL, but that is again up to the developer using the field
> at that point.
> 
> Feel free to drop them while applying, or should I reword the message to
> at least still link these commits to mention the origin of the unused
> fields?

I'm fine with having the Fixes removed. If you can send the v2 reordered 
& with tags removed, that would be the best.

> 
> - Marijn

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry