[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEDXAV7EJn9MH0Hd@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 23:09:05 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, prabhakar.csengg@...il.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
geert+renesas@...der.be, heiko@...ech.de, guoren@...nel.org,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, samuel@...lland.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Add non-coherent DMA support for AX45MP
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 08:59:03AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> IMO we should just take the support in Linux: trying to hide stuff behind the
> SBI leads to more more headaches than it's worth, we end up with a bunch of
> broken firmware to try and work around. We've already got a mess here because
> of the D1 support, we might as well just live with it.
I strongly disagree. Adding more and more per-vendor ops simply does
not scale. We're getting us into a giant long-time mess that will be
unfixable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists