[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEDzkhtUiUxQ0V4d@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:10:58 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Jun Li <jun.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 10/10] ARM64: dts: imx7ulp: update usb compatible
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:40:13AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 01:18:43AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 10/10] ARM64: dts: imx7ulp: update usb compatible
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:25:04PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > >
> > > > Per binding doc, update the compatible
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > ARM: dts: imx7ulp: ...
> > >
> > > Fixed it up and applied all DTS patches.
> > [Peng Fan]
> >
> > Thanks for the fix. But I think Greg already applied the patchset.
>
> Okay, I will drop them from my tree, but ...
>
> Greg,
>
> May I suggest a couple of things on the future process?
>
> - Could you leave i.MX DTS patches to me, so that we can avoid potential
> merge conflicts?
How am I supposed to know this? Our tools take the whole patch series,
not individual ones. If someone wants patches to go through different
trees, then they need to submit them as different patch series,
otherwise it makes no sense.
> - Would you update your patch robot to reply the applying message to all
> recipients, so that everyone knows the status?
Can't really do that, it only responds to those that are on the patch
signed-off-by list itself, as the other cc: metadata is gone after the
patch is applied.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists