[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f425205-c395-648a-3f42-a776c7580a8f@9elements.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 13:52:30 +0530
From: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
To: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add dt property
Hi Zev,
On 20-04-2023 05:31 am, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 07:50:50AM PDT, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>> Add DT property regulator-supplies.
>> This enables us to couple one or more regulator output to gether. This
>> is use in case of Single connector having 2 or more supplies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml
>> index 078b37a1a71a..17f683d3c1f3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-output.yaml
>> @@ -21,13 +21,19 @@ properties:
>> compatible:
>> const: regulator-output
>>
>> - vout-supply:
>> + regulator-supplies:
>> description:
>> - Phandle of the regulator supplying the output.
>> + Specifies the name of the output supply provided by the regulator.
>> + Defaults to "vout".
>> + default: "vout"
>> +
>
> Was this meant to be specified as a string-array to allow providing
> multiple names?
Yes. This is string-array.
>
>> +patternProperties:
>> + ".*-supply":
>> + description:
>> + Specified the phandle for various supplies
>>
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - - vout-supply
>>
>> additionalProperties: false
>>
>>
>
> I think it would be nice to also update the examples to show what a
> multi-supply instance would look like.
Ack. Will do that.
>
> A slightly more descriptive subject line would also be good -- "Add dt
> property" is a bit vague.
Suggestion ?
How about like 'Allow multiple supplies' or 'Add support for multiple
supplies'
>
>> base-commit: c55470f8b0616b0adb758077dbae9b19c5aac005
>> --
>> 2.39.1
>>
Regards,
Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists