[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rent0d0.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:38:03 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: haoxin <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,unmap: avoid flushing TLB in batch if PTE is
inaccessible
haoxin <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com> writes:
> ( 2023/4/10 .H3:52, Huang Ying S:
>> 0Day/LKP reported a performance regression for commit
>> 7e12beb8ca2a ("migrate_pages: batch flushing TLB"). In the commit, the
>> TLB flushing during page migration is batched. So, in
>> try_to_migrate_one(), ptep_clear_flush() is replaced with
>> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(). In further investigation, it is found
>> that the TLB flushing can be avoided in ptep_clear_flush() if the PTE
>> is inaccessible. In fact, we can optimize in similar way for the
>> batched TLB flushing too to improve the performance.
>>
>> So in this patch, we check pte_accessible() before
>> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending() in try_to_unmap/migrate_one(). Tests show
>> that the benchmark score of the anon-cow-rand-mt test case of
>> vm-scalability test suite can improve up to 2.1% with the patch on a
>> Intel server machine. The TLB flushing IPI can reduce up to 44.3%.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202303192325.ecbaf968-yujie.liu@intel.com
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/ab92aaddf1b52ede15e2c608696c36765a2602c1.camel@intel.com/
>> Fixes: 7e12beb8ca2a ("migrate_pages: batch flushing TLB")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> mm/rmap.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>> index 8632e02661ac..3c7c43642d7c 100644
>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>> @@ -1582,7 +1582,8 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> */
>> pteval = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, pvmw.pte);
>> - set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm,
>> pte_dirty(pteval));
>> + if (pte_accessible(mm, pteval))
>> + set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pte_dirty(pteval));
>> } else {
>> pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
>> }
>> @@ -1963,7 +1964,8 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> */
>> pteval = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, pvmw.pte);
>> - set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm,
>> pte_dirty(pteval));
>> + if (pte_accessible(mm, pteval))
>> + set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pte_dirty(pteval));
>
> Just a advice, can you put pte_accessible() into
> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pendin(), just like ptep_clear_flush(); so that we
> no need to add if (pte_accessible()) in per place
>
> where call set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending();
Sounds reasonable for me, will do that in the next version. Thanks for
suggestion.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
>> } else {
>> pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
>> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists