[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6175f709-8c88-6ec3-4c31-cac9f2440b52@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:36:24 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v2 00/14] SMD RPMCC sleep preparations
On 20.04.2023 09:56, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 03:50:16AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 8.03.2023 22:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> Keepalive clocks for other platforms were gathered by digging in old
>>> downstream kernels, please give them a test.
>> I have an implementation of rpmcc-within-icc ready(ish) locally. Turns out
>> some SoCs need a keepalive (19.2MHz, active-only) vote on clocks that
>> are NOT governed by interconnect.. So before we can disable clocks,
>> both will need to be implemented.. ugh... I was hoping we could avoid
>> having it in rpmcc..
>>
>
> Can you give an example? Which clocks are affected on which SoC?
msm8998/sdm660 and PNoC
Konrad
>
> Thanks,
> Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists