[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b65291ea-acca-7cd4-b5f5-f5bb46e679b4@zhaoxin.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:08:14 +0800
From: "WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com" <WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tonywwang@...oxin.com>,
<weitaowang@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin
On 2023/4/20 17:29, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:21:27AM +0800, Weitao Wang wrote:
>> Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin.
>>
>> Weitao Wang (3):
>> xhci: Add a quirk for zhaoxin xhci to fix issues.
>> xhci: Add zhaoxin xHCI U1/U2 feature support
>> xhci: Show zhaoxin xHCI root hub speed correctly
>>
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 5 ++++
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.32.0
>>
>
> Do these replace:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420093603.3344-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com
> or are they on top of them?
>
This [patch 2/3] and [patch 3/3] share a xhci quirk flag XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST,
So I put these independent functional patch in this set group.
Above url and below url are independent xHCI patch for zhaoxin.
Is it more suitable to put all the patch for zhaoxin xhci in one group?
I Hope to receive your guidance. Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230420104826.4727-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com/
Best Regards,
Weitao
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists