[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1mnv2d2.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:11:54 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc: shengjiu.wang@...il.com, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com,
nicoleotsuka@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: fsl: remove unnecessary dai_link->platform"
Hi Shengjiu
Cc Mark
Thank you for the patch
> This reverts commit 33683cbf49b5412061cb1e4c876063fdef86def4.
>
> dai_link->platform is needed. The platform component is
> "snd_dmaengine_pcm", which is registered from cpu driver,
>
> If dai_link->platform is not assigned, then platform
> component will not be probed, then there will be issue:
>
> aplay: main:831: audio open error: Invalid argument
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
> ---
And sorry to my noise patch. I understood the issue.
Can I ask 2 things ?
My original patch removed 3 platforms.
Then, I understood that 2 of them are used as
soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm (= 1st, 3rd platform).
I think we want to have comment here that
why dummy component is needed. Can you agree ?
I wonder how about 2nd platform ? Is it same ?
I'm asking because it doesn't have of_node which other 2 platforms have.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists