[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <658fe430-320f-5f4f-2011-9e1bd11d772c@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 19:08:24 +0800
From: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two warnings about rq clock
kindly ping...
On 2023/4/10 Hao Jia wrote:
> These two patches fix two warnings about rq clock
>
> Patch1 fixes the warning of using the old rq clock caused by
> missing update rq clock.
>
> Patch2 fixes the warning that the rq clock was updated multiple
> times while holding the rq lock.
>
> Hao Jia (2):
> sched/core: Fixed missing rq clock update before calling
> set_rq_offline()
> sched/core: Avoid double calling update_rq_clock()
>
> kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++----
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++---
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 10 ++++++----
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists