[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ccc85bd-0541-4ffb-a207-dfc533a2c0aa@kili.mountain>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:07:12 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>, Vicki Pfau <vi@...rift.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Pavel Rojtberg <rojtberg@...il.com>,
Nate Yocom <nate@...om.org>,
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>,
John Butler <radon86dev@...il.com>,
Matthias Benkmann <matthias.benkmann@...il.com>,
Christopher Crockett <chaorace@...il.com>,
Santosh De Massari <s.demassari@...il.com>,
hust-os-kernel-patches@...glegroups.com,
syzbot+a3f758b8d8cb7e49afec@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
"Pierre-Loup A. Griffais" <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: xpad - fix GPF in xpad_probe
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 01:42:21PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Btw, we should be thinking about how to detect these sorts of issues
> using static analysis. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as saying
> "We know this variable is NULL so don't dereference it." The problem
> with that is that many times Smatch sees where a pointer is set to NULL
> but not when it is assigned to a different value.
>
> What we could do instead is say:
> 1) If a pointer is dereferenced and we know it is NULL then:
> set_state_expr(my_id, expr, &suspicious);
> 2) If we set a pointer to non-NULL and it is marked as suspicious then
> print a warning.
I was thinking about this and it's not so simple. Normally after a
warning we return so the state never transitions from &suspicious to
non-NULL.
So what we could do is set the state to &suspicious. Then at the end of
the function we look at all the states at the return paths. If the
state is non-NULL on any return path then print a warning. This is easy
enough to do, but requires quite a bit of Smatch knowledge so I have
done it. Attached.
Unfortunately, it doesn't print a warning in this case because Smatch
doesn't track that _dev_warn() dereferences the "dev" pointer. The
__dev_printk() function only dereferences "dev" if it is non-NULL.
Smatch only counts it if it *always* dereferences it.
This could be fixed in two steps:
Step 1: track dereferences based on the return insead just yes/no.
Step 2: split _dev_warn() returns into two returns based on if dev is
NULL or non-NULL.
Step 1 is probably a good idea. Step 2 is a bad idea, because it makes
no sense to pass a NULL to dev_warn().
A better approach for this bug is to print a warning if people pass
the address of the offset from a NULL pointer. Combine that with the
same return states filter as earlier to eliminate false positives where
Smatch thinks a pointer is always NULL.
drivers/input/joystick/xpad.c:2053 xpad_probe() warn: address of NULL pointer 'xpad->dev'
drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-data.c:524 ccs_data_parse_rules() warn: address of NULL pointer 'rules'
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c:1482 lpfc_reset_pci_bus() warn: address of NULL pointer 'phba->pcidev'
That check is attached too.
regards,
dan carpenter
View attachment "check_deref_before_set.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (1714 bytes)
View attachment "check_bogus_address_param.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (2659 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists