lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fe1b7ab73842ad8ee430cb171b6a59e3d6003bb.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:26:53 +0300
From:   Dmitry Perchanov <dmitry.perchanov@...el.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        evgeni.raikhel@...el.com, demisrael@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: uvcvideo: Enable Intel RealSense metadata for
 devices.

Hi Sakari,

On Thu, 2023-04-20 at 12:24 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 12:06:55PM +0300, Dmitry Perchanov wrote:
> > Intel RealSense UVC Depth cameras produce metadata in a
> > vendor-specific format that is already supported by the uvcvideo driver.
> > Enable handling of this metadata for 7 additional RealSense devices.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Yu MENG <yu1.meng@...el.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Evgeni Raikhel <evgeni.raikhel@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Perchanov <dmitry.perchanov@...el.com>
> 
> Thanks for the update.
> 
> Is the D4XX format on these devices the same that's documented in
> Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/pixfmt-meta-d4xx.rst ? I.e. there are
> no additional fields or differences, and the version of the format is the
> same?
We verified the document and found it generally correct.
Although, we expanded number of fields and I can update this document.
> 
> The format documentation doesn't say which version number even the current
> devices use (just refers to "xxx").
The document compatible with all D4xx/D5xx devices so far.
We dropped all obsolete incompatible cameras from support.
> 

Should I submit another patch with extended structures?

Regards,
Dmitry P.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ