[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6bf601b-0466-cb94-22b2-1189724410c9@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 19:52:14 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/iova: Optimize iova_magazine_alloc()
On 2023/4/20 18:38, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2023-04-18 07:25, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Only the member 'size' needs to be initialized to 0. Clearing the array
>> pfns[], which is about 1 KiB in size, not only wastes time, but also
>> causes cache pollution.
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> index fe452ce466429a7..c970b9a2819d7bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> @@ -647,7 +647,13 @@ struct iova_rcache {
>> static struct iova_magazine *iova_magazine_alloc(gfp_t flags)
>> {
>> - return kzalloc(sizeof(struct iova_magazine), flags);
>> + struct iova_magazine *mag;
>> +
>> + mag = kmalloc(sizeof(struct iova_magazine), flags);
>
> Nit: maybe sizeof(*mag) is preferable?
Yes, sizeof(*mag) is the more recommended usage, I will post v2 tomorrow.
>
>> + if (mag)
>> + mag->size = 0;
>> +
>> + return mag;
>> }
>> static void iova_magazine_free(struct iova_magazine *mag)
>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists