[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92cf6ed0-be37-d8a6-14c7-c5043f076916@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 17:07:16 +0300
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>
To: Weitao Wang <WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tonywwang@...oxin.com, weitaowang@...oxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xhci: Add zhaoxin xHCI U1/U2 feature support
On 20.4.2023 20.21, Weitao Wang wrote:
> Add U1/U2 feature support of xHCI for zhaoxin.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weitao Wang <WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> index 6db07ca419c3..a235effe8e5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_PROMONTORYA_4))
> xhci->quirks |= XHCI_NO_SOFT_RETRY;
>
> + if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ZHAOXIN) {
> + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_LPM_SUPPORT;
> + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST;
> + }
> +
> /* xHC spec requires PCI devices to support D3hot and D3cold */
> if (xhci->hci_version >= 0x120)
> xhci->quirks |= XHCI_DEFAULT_PM_RUNTIME_ALLOW;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> index 6307bae9cddf..730c0f68518d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> @@ -4802,7 +4802,7 @@ static u16 xhci_calculate_u1_timeout(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> }
> }
>
> - if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_INTEL_HOST)
> + if (xhci->quirks & (XHCI_INTEL_HOST | XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST))
> timeout_ns = xhci_calculate_intel_u1_timeout(udev, desc);
Looks odd to tie Zhaoxin vendor to Intel specific values but ok,
if they diverge in the future we anyway need to modify this.
> else
> timeout_ns = udev->u1_params.sel;
> @@ -4866,7 +4866,7 @@ static u16 xhci_calculate_u2_timeout(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> }
> }
>
> - if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_INTEL_HOST)
> + if (xhci->quirks & (XHCI_INTEL_HOST | XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST))
> timeout_ns = xhci_calculate_intel_u2_timeout(udev, desc);
same.
> else
> timeout_ns = udev->u2_params.sel;
> @@ -4938,6 +4938,27 @@ static int xhci_update_timeout_for_interface(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int xhci_check_zhaoxin_tier_policy(struct usb_device *udev,
> + enum usb3_link_state state)
> +{
> + struct usb_device *parent;
> + unsigned int num_hubs;
> +
> + /* Don't enable U1/U2 if the device is on an external hub. */
> + for (parent = udev->parent, num_hubs = 0; parent->parent;
> + parent = parent->parent)
> + num_hubs++;
> +
> + if (num_hubs < 1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "Disabling U1/U2 link state for device"
> + " below external hub.\n");
> + dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "Plug device into root hub "
> + "to decrease power consumption.\n");
> + return -E2BIG;
> +}
> +
I don't think we should add more vendor specific functions, this is almost
an exact copy of xhci_check_intel_tier_policy().
How about getting rid of both of those and use something like this instead (untested):
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index 2b280beb0011..e9a25e4d99cf 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -4926,10 +4926,24 @@ static int xhci_check_tier_policy(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
struct usb_device *udev,
enum usb3_link_state state)
{
- if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_INTEL_HOST)
- return xhci_check_intel_tier_policy(udev, state);
- else
- return 0;
+ struct usb_device *parent = udev->parent;
+ int tier = 1; /* roothub is tier1 */
+
+ while (parent) {
+ parent = parent->parent;
+ tier++;
+ }
+
+ if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_INTEL_HOST && tier > 3)
+ goto fail;
+ if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST && tier > 2)
+ goto fail;
+
+ return 0;
+fail:
+ dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "Tier policy prevents U1/U2 LPM states for devices at tier %d\n",
+ tier);
+ return -E2BIG;
}
Or possibly even add a xhci->max_tier_for_lpm that can be set during probe based on
vendor or from device property.
Thanks
-Mathias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists