[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4385d07a-e124-d2f2-fbd0-eda1d602167b@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 07:40:00 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: b53: Slightly optimize b53_arl_read()
Le 21/04/2023 à 02:40, Florian Fainelli a écrit :
>
>
> On 4/20/2023 1:44 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> When the 'free_bins' bitmap is cleared, it is better to use its full
>> maximum size instead of only the needed size.
>> This lets the compiler optimize it because the size is now known at
>> compile
>> time. B53_ARLTBL_MAX_BIN_ENTRIES is small (i.e. currently 4), so a
>> call to
>> memset() is saved.
>>
>> Also, as 'free_bins' is local to the function, the non-atomic __set_bit()
>> can also safely be used here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>> b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>> index 3464ce5e7470..8c55fe0e0747 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>> @@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static int b53_arl_read(struct b53_device *dev,
>> u64 mac,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> - bitmap_zero(free_bins, dev->num_arl_bins);
>> + bitmap_zero(free_bins, B53_ARLTBL_MAX_BIN_ENTRIES);
>
> That one I am not a big fan, as the number of ARL bins is a function of
> the switch model, and this illustrates it well.
Ok, up to you to take or not what looks the better solution.
From my point of view, the "for (i = 0; i < dev->num_arl_bins" below
illustrates it better.
Maybe, another approach to save the memset() call would be remove the
bitmap_zero() call, and declare 'free_bins' as:
DECLARE_BITMAP(free_bins, B53_ARLTBL_MAX_BIN_ENTRIES) = { };
(this syntax is already used in b53_configure_vlan())
The compiler should still be able to optimize the initialisation and
this wouldn't, IMHO, introduce confusion about the intent.
Let me know if you prefer to leave this hunk as-is, or if this other
alternative pleases you.
CJ
>
>> /* Read the bins */
>> for (i = 0; i < dev->num_arl_bins; i++) {
>> @@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static int b53_arl_read(struct b53_device *dev,
>> u64 mac,
>> b53_arl_to_entry(ent, mac_vid, fwd_entry);
>> if (!(fwd_entry & ARLTBL_VALID)) {
>> - set_bit(i, free_bins);
>> + __set_bit(i, free_bins);
>
> I would be keen on taking that hunk but keep the other as-is. Does that
> work for you?
> --
> Florian
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists