[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4aea4b5-d86a-1604-c646-346ea7b59476@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:38:21 +0200
From: Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@...too.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: ov5693: Simplify an error message
Am 15.04.23 um 18:28 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> dev_err_probe() already display the error code. There is no need to
> duplicate it explicitly in the error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> index e3c3bed69ad6..d23786afd754 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> @@ -404,8 +404,8 @@ static int ov5693_read_reg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693, u32 addr, u32 *value)
> ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, 2);
> if (ret < 0)
i2c_transfer returns the number of transmitted messages. So I think the
values 0 <= ret < 2 also need to be handled.
> return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> - "Failed to read register 0x%04x: %d\n",
> - addr & OV5693_REG_ADDR_MASK, ret);
> + "Failed to read register 0x%04x\n",
> + addr & OV5693_REG_ADDR_MASK);
>
> *value = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists