linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix incorrect alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:48:04 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix incorrect alloc_workqueue()
 invocation

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:38:49AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> I though so, but as usual I am not sure what to do when we are fixing something
> in the middle of a cycle... Raw support went in v6.3-rc1 and we are now in
> v6.3-rc7, so if you want to pick this up now (as it seems the case) it will fix
> the above yes, but it is anyway still on an unreleased kernel...so nothing really
> to have to apply on any early stable kernels...buh..I dont know what is the rule,
> but the Fix tag seems harmless ... so why not :D
> 

Not that complicated TBH. If you know this fixes a particular commit in the
tree, just add Fixes tag. The stable maintainers have made it easier in
general by relying on the fixes tag and not needing explicit stable tag in
most of the cases. I will add it.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep