[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo525ogS4LSZDUyaqjSqjJWj=qLRkphji5469=3obFXoMrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:26:55 +0100
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Christopher Healy <healych@...zon.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] drm: Add fdinfo memory stats
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 23:43, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> +/**
> + * enum drm_gem_object_status - bitmask of object state for fdinfo reporting
> + * @DRM_GEM_OBJECT_RESIDENT: object is resident in memory (ie. not unpinned)
> + * @DRM_GEM_OBJECT_PURGEABLE: object marked as purgeable by userspace
> + *
> + * Bitmask of status used for fdinfo memory stats, see &drm_gem_object_funcs.status
> + * and drm_show_fdinfo(). Note that an object can DRM_GEM_OBJECT_PURGEABLE if
> + * it still active or not resident, in which case drm_show_fdinfo() will not
nit: s/can/can be/;s/if it still/if it is still/
> + * account for it as purgeable. So drivers do not need to check if the buffer
> + * is idle and resident to return this bit. (Ie. userspace can mark a buffer
> + * as purgeable even while it is still busy on the GPU.. it does not _actually_
> + * become puregeable until it becomes idle. The status gem object func does
nit: s/puregeable/purgeable/
I think we want a similar note in the drm-usage-stats.rst file.
With the above the whole series is:
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Fwiw: Keeping the i915 patch as part of this series would be great.
Sure i915_drm_client->id becomes dead code, but it's a piece one can
live with for a release or two. Then again it's not my call to make.
HTH
Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists