[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eecf54cdc06a4e3690e2cad62a8d4596@realtek.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:19:40 +0000
From: Stanley Chang[昌育德]
<stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Bhuvanesh Surachari <Bhuvanesh_Surachari@...tor.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>,
Ray Chi <raychi@...gle.com>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] usb: phy: add usb phy notify port status API
> > > We can not add callbacks in the kernel that are not actually used,
> > > otherwise they will just be instantly removed.
> > >
> > > Please submit any drivers that need this change at the same time so
> > > that we can verify that the callback is actually correct and needed,
> > > otherwise we can not take this change.
> > >
> >
> > In this stage, we usb phy driver is not at linux upstream.
>
> Then obviously we can not take this change (nor would you want us to.)
I will prepare a complete driver for review.
> > For the android GKI, we have to add this callback to upstream or use the
> vendor hook of android.
> > I will plan to upstream the realtek usb phy driver.
>
> As you already have this driver, why not send it to us now?
>
Now the driver doesn't match the coding style.
After I refactor it, I will send this driver upstream.
Thanks,
Stanley
Powered by blists - more mailing lists