[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230421121605.GA30924@green245>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 17:46:05 +0530
From: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
asml.silence@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, leit@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
sagi@...mberg.me, hch@....de, kbusch@...nel.org,
ming.lei@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] io_uring: Pass the whole sqe to commands
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 04:44:37AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>These three patches prepare for the sock support in the io_uring cmd, as
>described in the following RFC:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230406144330.1932798-1-leitao@debian.org/
>
>Since the support linked above depends on other refactors, such as the sock
>ioctl() sock refactor[1], I would like to start integrating patches that have
>consensus and can bring value right now. This will also reduce the patchset
>size later.
>
>Regarding to these three patches, they are simple changes that turn
>io_uring cmd subsystem more flexible (by passing the whole SQE to the
>command), and cleaning up an unnecessary compile check.
Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists