[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b0e06e0-5dd4-8ca7-6d85-b492468fd71a@shopee.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:50:05 +0800
From: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: mszeredi@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, mcgrof@...nel.org,
xiubli@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vfs: clean up d_backing_inode() function
On 2023/4/21 04:45, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 10:47:04AM +0000, Haifeng Xu wrote:
>> d_backing_inode() does the same thing with d_inode(), so using
>> d_inode() to get the inode of dentry instead of d_backing_inode().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
>> Suggested-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
>
> Fine by me, but generally that kind of search-and-replace is
> better done differently:
>
> 1) patch replacing the definition of d_backing_inode() with
> #define d_backing_inode d_inode
>
> 2) mail to Linus, asking to do mechanical search-and-replace
> just prior to -rc1; see e.g. 7c0f6ba682b9 for example of
> that being done. In this case the script would be
> sed -i -e "s/\<d_backing_inode\>/d_inode/g" $(git grep -l -w "d_backing_inode")
> sed -i -e "/#define d_inode d_inode/d" include/linux/dentry.h
Thanks for your suggestion.
The file "include/linux/dentry.h" doesn't exist, do you mean "include/linux/dcache.h"?
By the way, why we need to add a definiton first and delete it later instead of replacing
the "d_backing_inode" directly?
In addition, there's another patch need to be reviewed.
link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419072736.172593-1-haifeng.xu@shopee.com/
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists