Message-ID: <CAF6AEGtijkCt2uUx98auFcK0GQHY=5GV7CxbOejGz22no6J0GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 07:47:26 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Cc:     Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
        Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" 
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" 
        <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] drm/msm: Rework get_comm_cmdline() helper

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 2:33 AM Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Greeting all,
>
> Sorry for the delay - Easter Holidays, food coma and all that :-)
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 15:31, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 1:34 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 09:27:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 17/04/2023 21:12, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Make it work in terms of ctx so that it can be re-used for fdinfo.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c |  4 ++--
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c           |  2 ++
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c           | 13 ++++++-------
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h           | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c   |  1 +
> > > > >   5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > > > > index bb38e728864d..43c4e1fea83f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > > > > @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ int adreno_set_param(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
> > > > >             /* Ensure string is null terminated: */
> > > > >             str[len] = '\0';
> > > > > -           mutex_lock(&gpu->lock);
> > > > > +           mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
> > > > >             if (param == MSM_PARAM_COMM) {
> > > > >                     paramp = &ctx->comm;
> > > > > @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ int adreno_set_param(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
> > > > >             kfree(*paramp);
> > > > >             *paramp = str;
> > > > > -           mutex_unlock(&gpu->lock);
> > > > > +           mutex_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> > > > >             return 0;
> > > > >     }
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> > > > > index 3d73b98d6a9c..ca0e89e46e13 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> > > > > @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ static int context_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> > > > >     rwlock_init(&ctx->queuelock);
> > > > >     kref_init(&ctx->ref);
> > > > > +   ctx->pid = get_pid(task_pid(current));
> > > >
> > > > Would it simplify things for msm if DRM core had an up to date file->pid as
> > > > proposed in
> > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/526752/?series=109902&rev=4 ? It
> > > > gets updated if ioctl issuer is different than fd opener and this being
> > > > context_init here reminded me of it. Maybe you wouldn't have to track the
> > > > pid in msm?
> >
> > The problem is that we also need this for gpu devcore dumps, which
> > could happen after the drm_file is closed.  The ctx can outlive the
> > file.
> >
> I think we all kept forgetting about that. MSM had support for ages,
> while AMDGPU is the second driver to land support - just a release
> ago.
>
> > But the ctx->pid has the same problem as the existing file->pid when
> > it comes to Xorg.. hopefully over time that problem just goes away.
>
> Out of curiosity: what do you mean with "when it comes to Xorg" - the
> "was_master" handling or something else?

The problem is that Xorg is the one to open the drm fd, and then
passes the fd to the client.. so the pid of drm_file is the Xorg pid,
not the client.  Making it not terribly informative.

Tvrtko's patch he linked above would address that for drm_file, but
not for other driver internal usages.  Maybe it could be wired up as a
helper so that drivers don't have to re-invent that dance.  Idk, I
have to think about it.

Btw, with my WIP drm sched fence signalling patch lockdep is unhappy
when gpu devcore dumps are triggered.  I'm still pondering how to
decouple the locking so that anything coming from fs (ie.
show_fdinfo()) is decoupled from anything that happens in the fence
signaling path.  But will repost this series once I get that sorted
out.

BR,
-R

>
> > guess I could do a similar dance to your patch to update the pid
> > whenever (for ex) a submitqueue is created.
> >
> > > Can we go one step further and let the drm fdinfo stuff print these new
> > > additions? Consistency across drivers and all that.
> >
> > Hmm, I guess I could _also_ store the overridden comm/cmdline in
> > drm_file.  I still need to track it in ctx (msm_file_private) because
> > I could need it after the file is closed.
> >
> > Maybe it could be useful to have a gl extension to let the app set a
> > name on the context so that this is useful beyond native-ctx (ie.
> > maybe it would be nice to see that "chrome: lwn.net" is using less gpu
> > memory than "chrome: phoronix.com", etc)
> >
>
> /me awaits for the series to hit the respective websites ;-)
>
> But seriously - the series from Tvrtko (thanks for the link, will
> check in a moment) makes sense. Although given the livespan issue
> mentioned above, I don't think it's applicable here.
>
> So if it were me, I would consider the two orthogonal for the
> short/mid term. Fwiw this and patch 1/3 are:
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
>
> HTH
> -Emil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists