linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm63xx: remove PM_SLEEP based conditional compilation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 17:06:41 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
Cc:     Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>, Vignesh <vigneshr@...com>,
        Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
        Tanguy Bouzeloc <tanguy.bouzeloc@...xo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm63xx: remove PM_SLEEP based conditional
 compilation

On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 17:46:15 +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> Get rid of conditional compilation based on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP because
> it may introduce build issues with certain configs where it maybe disabled
> This is because if above config is not enabled the suspend-resume
> functions are never part of the code but the bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops struct
> still inits them to non-existent suspend-resume functions.
> 
> Fixes: b42dfed83d95 ("spi: add Broadcom BCM63xx SPI controller driver")
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: bcm63xx: remove PM_SLEEP based conditional compilation
      commit: 25f0617109496e1aff49594fbae5644286447a0f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark