linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/10] wifi: rtw88: fix incorrect error codes in rtw_debugfs_set_rf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tencent_588107D54A02EA06A1D67C6B118CC3A35805@qq.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Apr 2023 18:04:50 +0800
From:   Zhang Shurong <zhang_shurong@...mail.com>
To:     tony0620emma@...il.com
Cc:     kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Shurong <zhang_shurong@...mail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] wifi: rtw88: fix incorrect error codes in rtw_debugfs_set_rf_write

If there is a failure during copy_from_user or user-provided data
buffer is invalid, rtw_debugfs_set_rf_write should return negative
error code instead of a positive value count.

Fix this bug by returning correct error code.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Shurong <zhang_shurong@...mail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
index 911f0514c497..259e6c15bc78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
@@ -423,14 +423,17 @@ static ssize_t rtw_debugfs_set_rf_write(struct file *filp,
 	char tmp[32 + 1];
 	u32 path, addr, mask, val;
 	int num;
+	int ret;
 
-	rtw_debugfs_copy_from_user(tmp, sizeof(tmp), buffer, count, 4);
+	ret = rtw_debugfs_copy_from_user(tmp, sizeof(tmp), buffer, count, 4);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
 	num = sscanf(tmp, "%x %x %x %x", &path, &addr, &mask, &val);
 
 	if (num !=  4) {
 		rtw_warn(rtwdev, "invalid args, [path] [addr] [mask] [val]\n");
-		return count;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
-- 
2.40.0